Home > Resources > HR compliance > Employment agreements > Virginia expands noncompete ban to health care professionals
Brightmine office worker working on her laptop

Virginia expands noncompete ban to health care professionals

This article explains Virginia’s new law prohibiting noncompete agreements for health care professionals and outlines exceptions, permitted repayment provisions, and related compliance considerations.

|

Read time:

1–2 minutes

Written by:

Share

Beginning July 1, 2026, Virginia joins more than 20 other states in barring or limiting the use of noncompete agreements with health care professionals.

After the state legislature accepted her recommended changes to the bill, Gov. Abigail Spanberger signed SB128 into law. It prohibits employers from entering or enforcing noncompete agreements with health care professionals.

The law defines health care professional more broadly than most state laws to include any person licensed, registered or certified by the Boards of Medicine, Nursing, Counseling, Optometry, Psychology or Social Work. The law provides an exception for noncompetes included as part of an agreement for the sale of a healthcare professional’s interest in a business.

The law preserves options for employers to protect investments in recruitment and training. Employers may require repayment from a departing health care professional who has been employed for fewer than five years for all or a prorated portion of recruitment-related costs, such as:

  • Relocation expenses, signing or retention bonuses and other compensation used to induce a health care profession to relocate or establish a practice in a specific geographic area; and
  • Recruiting, education or training expenses.

Nonsolicitation agreements permitted

The law also allows room for nonsolicitation agreements that prohibit a departing health care professional from soliciting or attempting to solicit the employer’s customers with whom the professional had material contact during employment.

However, nonsolicitation provisions may not interfere with patient choice and must permit a health care professional to inform patients they treated or consulted before their departure about the professional’s continued practice of medicine, new contact information and the patient’s right to choose a health care provider.

Share


Robert Teachout

Written by:


Jurisdiction: Virginia

Navigate HR complexity with confidence

With Brightmine, you can build powerful people strategies, implement best practices and set your organization up for a brighter future.

Learn how our tools, resources and automation can empower you and your team.

You may also be interested in…

HR News

Tennessee passes salary threshold for employee noncompetes

This article explains Tennessee’s new law restricting the use of noncompete agreements for lower‑paid employees and outlines key …

HR law guides

New hire paperwork: Federal

This guide provides HR professionals with an overview of federal requirements related to obtaining information from and providing …

Guides – How to

How to reclassify an employee whose job duties have changed

This guide outlines practical steps employers should take when reclassifying an employee due to changes in job duties, …

Topics on this page


About the author

Legal Editor

Areas of expertise: Labor relations, Performance appraisals and promotions, Succession and workforce planning, HR professional development, Employment contracts, HR strategy, FMLA, ADA, EEO, Federal and state leave laws, Wage assignment and garnishment

Sign up to receive expert HR insights from Brightmine

    LNRS Data Services Limited and its affiliates may contact you about relevant solutions, services, events and industry insights. You can opt-out via the unsubscribe link in the communications that you receive or by contacting us.