Home > Resources > HR compliance > Employment law updates > Court Cancels PWFA Abortion Accommodations

Court Cancels PWFA Abortion Accommodations

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) no longer requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees for “purely elective” abortions that are not necessary to treat a medical condition related to pregnancy.

Share this:

Published: 23 May 2025 | by Michael Cardman, Brightmine Senior Legal Editor

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) no longer requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees for “purely elective” abortions that are not necessary to treat a medical condition related to pregnancy.

This comes after a federal district court recently vacated 2024 PWFA regulations to the extent that they include abortion as a “related medical condition” of pregnancy and childbirth.

The PWFA requires covered employers to reasonably accommodate employees’ known limitations that result from pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions, unless an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the employer.

The law took effect in June 2023. About a year later, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued implementing regulations that defined pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition broadly, encompassing current pregnancy, past pregnancy, potential or intended pregnancy (including infertility, fertility treatment and contraception), labor, childbirth, termination of pregnancy (including miscarriage, stillbirth and abortion), lactation and many associated health conditions.

State attorneys general for Mississippi and Louisiana and organizations affiliated with the Catholic Church sued the EEOC, arguing there was no statutory basis to include abortion in the PWFA’s coverage. On May 21, the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana sided with the plaintiffs, saying Congress would have included references to abortion in the PWFA statute if it had intended for abortion to be covered under the law.

The court noted, however, that terminations of pregnancy or abortions stemming from the underlying treatment of a medical condition related to pregnancy are not affected by its order.

See our extensive HR resources and expertise

In an ever-changing regulatory environment, we have everything you need to stay in control and compliant.

About the author

Michael Cardman, Senior Legal Editor at Brightmine

Michael Cardman
Senior Legal Editor, Brightmine

Michael Cardman has more than 20 years of experience in publishing and has specialized in employment law for more than 15 years. As a member of the Brightmine editorial team, he focuses on wage and hour compliance, including minimum wage, overtime, employee classification, hours worked, independent contractors and child labor.

Michael holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in English from the University of Virginia. Prior to joining Brightmine, he was the managing editor for Thompson Publishing Group’s library of HR publications. In this role, he was responsible for overseeing books, manuals and online tools covering a variety of topics such as wage and hour, employee leaves, employee benefits and compensation.

Connect with Michael on LinkedIn.

You may also be interested in…

HR News

Colorado delays implementation of AI discrimination law

Colorado delayed its AI bias law from February 1, 2026, to June 30, 2026, giving employers more time …

HR News

DOL plans new rules on overtime, independent contractors and more

New DOL rules are set to reshape overtime, independent contractor and other rules, marking a new chapter under …

HR News

New visa program could impact business travel

The US may soon require certain foreign nationals visiting for business activities—like meetings or training—to post bonds up …