Home > HR compliance > Layoffs > Mass layoffs, reductions in force and plant closings: Federal
Table notebook-

Mass layoffs, reductions in force and plant closings: Federal

This guide provides an overview of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, including employer coverage, triggering events, notice requirements, and compliance considerations for mass layoffs and plant closings.

|

Read time

1–2 minutes

|

Share this:

by Rebecca Sipowicz and Darrell R. VanDeusen, Kollman & Saucier, PA

Summary

This guide provides an overview of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, outlining the requirements for employers to give advance notice to employees affected by plant closings or mass layoffs. It discusses the criteria for employer coverage, triggering events and notice requirements, along with exemptions and exceptions under the Act.

In this guide, learn about:

  • WARN Act
    • Employer coverage
    • Triggering events
    • Notice requirements
    • Exemptions from notice requirements
    • Exceptions to advance notice requirements
    • Notice distribution requirements
    • Additional notice
    • Effect of other laws and agreements
    • Penalties and enforcement
  • Penalties and enforcement
  • Alternatives to layoffs
    • Furloughs
    • Voluntary attrition programs
  • Identifying job-related criteria for layoff selection
    • Pre-layoff planning and preparation
  • Future developments

Want to see more?

For full access to our guide:

Mass layoffs, reductions in force and plant closings: Federal

sign up for an HR and Compliance Center subscription today.

Jurisdiction: Federal

Get ahead of HR compliance

Navigating today’s complex HR compliance landscape is challenging.

Get ahead with Brightmine. Access HR resources and automation tools managed by seasoned human HR experts.

Proudly partnered with LexisNexis®

You may also be interested in…

Blogs

Why organizational alignment breaks between functions

Policy, reward and manager guidance are often owned by different teams, so reasonable local decisions can add up …

HR News

California captive-audience ban remains blocked

The 9th Circuit has upheld a preliminary injunction blocking California from enforcing its ban on captive audience meetings, …

Commentary and Insights

Ask our experts: Avoiding payroll gaps when changing pay frequency from semimonthly to biweekly

Learn how to avoid payroll compliance gaps when changing pay frequency from semimonthly to biweekly, including PTO, overtime …

Topics on this page


About the authors

Rebecca Sipowicz

Rebecca Sipowicz is an attorney with over ten years of experience in civil litigation and employment law. She has extensive experience managing complex litigation such as class actions and residential mortgage litigation, including without limitation, servicing claims, complex contested foreclosures, complex contested evictions, adversary complaints, and affirmative actions.

Ms. Sipowicz has written about business tort law in Massachusetts and has also been published on various antitrust law topics. She received her BA, with distinction, from the University of Virginia in 1998 and her JD from the University of Michigan Law School in 2001.

Connect with Rebecca on LinkedIn


Sign up to receive expert HR insights from Brightmine

    LNRS Data Services Limited and its affiliates may contact you about relevant solutions, services, events and industry insights. You can opt-out via the unsubscribe link in the communications that you receive or by contacting us.