Home > HR compliance > Employment discrimination > EEOC pay data reporting (EEO-1 Component 2 reporting) returning
HR manager completing their EEO-1 compontent 2 analysis.

EEOC pay data reporting (EEO-1 Component 2 reporting) returning

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has indicated that it plans to resume collecting pay data from employers that are subject to EEO-1 reporting requirements.

|

Read time:

1–2 minutes

Written by:

Share

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has indicated that it plans to resume collecting pay data from employers that are subject to EEO-1 reporting requirements.

Pay data collection, also known as EEO-1 Component 2 reporting, was an Obama-era initiative that required private employers with 100 or more employees to submit aggregated information on employee compensation and hours worked, broken down by race, ethnicity, sex and job category. The EEOC’s goal in collecting pay data was to gain insight into pay disparities in the workforce in order to better target its enforcement efforts.

Pay data collection was scheduled to begin in March 2018, but in 2017, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) blocked the collection before it began. After a series of legal developments, a federal judge ultimately ordered the EEOC to collect 2017 and 2018 pay data, which it did. However, in 2019, the EEOC voted to discontinue Component 2 collection in the future.

Speculation that the EEOC would revive pay data reporting has existed since President Biden took office in 2021. The latest Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions – a list of federal agencies’ upcoming rulemaking plans – confirms this conjecture. The EEOC announced in the Spring 2024 Unified Agenda, published earlier this month, that it plans to issue a proposed rule regarding pay data collection in January 2025.

However, the future of pay data collection at the federal level remains uncertain. Regulatory actions rarely meet projected timelines, and the outcome of the 2024 presidential election could lead the EEOC to change course yet again.

Pay data collection is already required for some employers under state laws in California and Illinois, and Massachusetts is considering a bill that would make it the third state to enact a similar law.

Share


Emily Scace

Written by:


Navigate HR complexity with confidence

With Brightmine, you can build powerful people strategies, implement best practices and set your organization up for a brighter future.

Learn how our tools, resources and automation can empower you and your team.

You may also be interested in…

Webinars

The evolving reality of pay transparency: Data, risk and credibility

Join Brightmine and Equifax on August 12 to explore how employers can turn pay transparency into a strategic …

Whitepapers

Getting pay transparency right

Learn how to get pay transparency right with practical guidance on pay ranges, compliance requirements, and risk reduction …

Blogs

SHRM 2026: 3 Key Takeaways

What did SHRM 2026 reveal? Read 3 essential HR compliance takeaways, including AI governance, pay transparency, and multistate …

Topics on this page


About the author

Senior Legal Editor, Brightmine

Areas of expertise: Employment discrimination and harassment, Pay equity, Pay transparency, Disability and accommodations, Workplace discrimination

Sign up to receive expert HR insights from Brightmine

    LNRS Data Services Limited and its affiliates may contact you about relevant solutions, services, events and industry insights. You can opt-out via the unsubscribe link in the communications that you receive or by contacting us.