Home > Resources > HR compliance > Employment discrimination > California captive audience meeting ban signed by Gov. Newsom
Employees discussing whether they'll attend the captive audience meeting at their work.

California captive audience meeting ban signed by Gov. Newsom

California has joined the ranks of states barring employers from requiring employees to attend meetings intended to communicate the employer’s opinions on unions.

|

Read time:

1–2 minutes

Written by:

Share

California has joined the ranks of states barring employers from requiring employees to attend meetings intended to communicate the employer’s opinions on unions. Signing S.B. 399 into law, Gov. Gavin Newsom has made California the largest state to prohibit so-called “captive audience” meetings.

The California Worker Freedom From Employer Intimidation Act, effective January 1, 2025, prohibits employers from discharging, disciplining or otherwise penalizing or taking an adverse employment action against an employee — or threatening to do so — for declining to attend or participate in a meeting or to listen to communication from the employer conveying its opinion on political matters. Political matters are defined as matters relating to elections for political office, political parties, legislation, regulation, and the decision to join or support any political party or political or labor organization.

Unlike such laws in other states, the California law requires an employer to continue to pay an employee who is working at the time of a captive audience meeting and elects not to attend.

An employer that violates the law is subject to a civil penalty of $500 per employee for each violation. The Labor Commissioner may enforce the law, or an employee who has suffered a violation of may bring a civil action in a court for damages caused by that adverse action, including punitive damages.

The law does not prohibit communication with employees that are required by law or that are necessary for employees to perform their jobs.

Similar captive audience laws have been enacted by Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Vermont and Washington in the past year. The legislation has followed calls by National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo to ban the practice as a violation of employees’ free speech rights. Such meetings are permitted under the National Labor Relations Act.

Share


Robert Teachout

Written by:


Navigate HR complexity with confidence

With Brightmine, you can build powerful people strategies, implement best practices and set your organization up for a brighter future.

Learn how our tools, resources and automation can empower you and your team.

You may also be interested in…

HR News

Study finds extensive racial bias by AI hiring tools

A major Stanford study finds that widely used AI hiring tools may be reinforcing racial bias at scale. …

Charts

EEO protected classes by state

Explore state‑by‑state EEO protected classes to help HR teams understand discrimination laws and maintain compliant employment practices.

HR News

EEOC proposes to end EEO-1 reporting

The EEOC has proposed ending EEO-1 reporting requirements. Learn what the proposal includes and the latest developments.

Topics on this page


About the author

Legal Editor

Areas of expertise: Labor relations, Performance appraisals and promotions, Succession and workforce planning, HR professional development, Employment contracts, HR strategy, FMLA, ADA, EEO, Federal and state leave laws, Wage assignment and garnishment

Sign up to receive expert HR insights from Brightmine

    LNRS Data Services Limited and its affiliates may contact you about relevant solutions, services, events and industry insights. You can opt-out via the unsubscribe link in the communications that you receive or by contacting us.