Home > HR compliance > Employment law updates > Court Cancels PWFA Abortion Accommodations

Court Cancels PWFA Abortion Accommodations

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) no longer requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees for “purely elective” abortions that are not necessary to treat a medical condition related to pregnancy.

|

Read time:

1–2 minutes

Written by:

Share

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) no longer requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to employees for “purely elective” abortions that are not necessary to treat a medical condition related to pregnancy.

This comes after a federal district court recently vacated 2024 PWFA regulations to the extent that they include abortion as a “related medical condition” of pregnancy and childbirth.

The PWFA requires covered employers to reasonably accommodate employees’ known limitations that result from pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions, unless an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the employer.

The law took effect in June 2023. About a year later, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued implementing regulations that defined pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition broadly, encompassing current pregnancy, past pregnancy, potential or intended pregnancy (including infertility, fertility treatment and contraception), labor, childbirth, termination of pregnancy (including miscarriage, stillbirth and abortion), lactation and many associated health conditions.

State attorneys general for Mississippi and Louisiana and organizations affiliated with the Catholic Church sued the EEOC, arguing there was no statutory basis to include abortion in the PWFA’s coverage. On May 21, the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana sided with the plaintiffs, saying Congress would have included references to abortion in the PWFA statute if it had intended for abortion to be covered under the law.

The court noted, however, that terminations of pregnancy or abortions stemming from the underlying treatment of a medical condition related to pregnancy are not affected by its order.

Share


Michael Cardman

Written by:


Navigate HR complexity with confidence

With Brightmine, you can build powerful people strategies, implement best practices and set your organization up for a brighter future.

Learn how our tools, resources and automation can empower you and your team.

You may also be interested in…

HR News

California bereavement leave will include designated persons

California is expanding bereavement leave protections to include a designated person whose relationship with an employee is equivalent …

Webinars

Beyond the ADA: Meeting emerging accommodation challenges

Explore emerging accommodation challenges beyond the ADA, including religious, pregnancy, reproductive health, mental health, neurodiversity and AI-related issues, …

HR News

$103,265 fee planned for all cap-subject H-1B petitions

DHS plans to impose an additional $103,265 fee on all H-1B petitions subject to the annual cap, regardless …

Topics on this page


About the author

Senior Legal Editor

Areas of expertise: Wage and hour compliance, Minimum wage law, Overtime law, Employee classification, HR compliance for independent contractors, Child labor law

Sign up to receive expert HR insights from Brightmine

    LNRS Data Services Limited and its affiliates may contact you about relevant solutions, services, events and industry insights. You can opt-out via the unsubscribe link in the communications that you receive or by contacting us.