Home > Total rewards > Employee compensation > Pay equity > New Jersey pay transparency law passed by General Assembly
HR total rewards specialist reviewing the organization's pay transparency data.

New Jersey pay transparency law passed by General Assembly

A New Jersey pay transparency law, S.B. 2310, is now with Gov. Phil Murphy. It would require many employers operating in the state to include pay and benefits information in job postings.

|

Read time:

1–2 minutes

Written by:

Share

The New Jersey General Assembly has passed a bill that would require many employers operating in the state to include pay and benefits information in job postings. If Gov. Phil Murphy signs the bill, New Jersey would become the fourteenth state to enact a pay transparency law.

S.B. 2310 would apply to any employer with 10 or more employees that does business, employs workers or takes job applications within New Jersey. Covered employers would be required to include a pay range and general description of benefits and other compensation in any external or internal job posting.

Temporary help firms and consulting agencies would not be required to include pay ranges or benefits information in postings with the purpose of identifying qualified applicants for potential future job openings. However, these firms would be required to provide this information to applicants at the time of interview or hire for a specific job opening.

In addition to pay transparency, the bill would increase transparency for internal advancement opportunities. Before making a promotion decision, employers would be required to make reasonable efforts to inform current employees in the affected department of the opening. The law defines a promotion as a change in job title and an increase in compensation.

Promotions based on years of experience or job performance would not be subject to the notification requirement, and employers would still be able to make promotion decisions on an emergent basis due to unforeseen events.

A first violation of the law would carry a civil penalty of $300, and each subsequent violation would be subject to a $600 penalty. These penalty amounts are significantly lower than those in an earlier version of the bill, which would have imposed per-violation penalties up to $10,000.

Once the bill is transmitted to Gov. Murphy, he must sign or veto it within 45 days, or it will become law without his signature. The law would take effect on the first day of the seventh month following its enactment.

Share


Emily Scace

Written by:


Navigate HR complexity with confidence

With Brightmine, you can build powerful people strategies, implement best practices and set your organization up for a brighter future.

Learn how our tools, resources and automation can empower you and your team.

You may also be interested in…

Whitepapers

The pay confidence gap: The human risk hiding in your decisions

Employees do not need perfect pay decisions, but they do need confidence that those decisions are fair. Learn …

Blogs

Are your reward decisions built to earn trust?

Set pay ranges with confidence. Evaluate your approach to job architecture, range pricing, exceptions and pay transparency requirements.

Blogs

Check your blind spot: Can you defend the pay ranges you publish?

Test whether your compensation governance can withstand scrutiny. Identify weaknesses in pay disclosure, documentation and decision-making processes.

Topics on this page


About the author

Senior Legal Editor, Brightmine

Areas of expertise: Employment discrimination and harassment, Pay equity, Pay transparency, Disability and accommodations, Workplace discrimination

Sign up to receive expert HR insights from Brightmine

    LNRS Data Services Limited and its affiliates may contact you about relevant solutions, services, events and industry insights. You can opt-out via the unsubscribe link in the communications that you receive or by contacting us.