Edwards v National Coal Board [1949]: Defining “Reasonably Practicable” in Workplace Safety Law
Date of judgement: December 31, 1949
In Edwards v National Coal Board [1949] 1 All ER 743 CA, the Court of Appeal held that ‘reasonably practicable’ is a narrower term than ‘physically possible’ and implies a computation between quantum of risk on the one hand and the time, cost and trouble of safeguards on the other. If a defendant can show a gross disproportion between them, the risk being insignificant in relation to the sacrifice, the duty holder discharges the onus that is upon him or her.
Want to learn more?
For full access to Edwards v National Coal Board and the outcomes of more employment law cases, sign up to a HR and Compliance Centre subscription today.
You may also be interested in…
About the author
Brightmine
With more than 10,000 customers, Brightmine is a leading global provider of people data, analytics and insight – empowering HR leaders to deliver brighter business outcomes.
For more than two decades, Brightmine, formerly XpertHR, has continued to help HR leaders confidently navigate the evolving world of work through our unique combination of critical workforce data, AI-enabled technology, and trusted HR expertise.
Brightmine is a division of LexisNexis Data Services within RELX®, a global provider of information-based analytics and decision tools. RELX serves customers in 180+ countries with 35,000+ employees. Ticker: London: REL; Amsterdam: REN; New York: RELX.
Follow Brightmine on LinkedIn
Start your free trial today
Register today to gain free 7-day access to the Brightmine HR & Compliance Centre and stay up to date, compliant and save valuable time