Brightmine legal editor Lilia Dangi joins the podcast to talk through recent and upcoming trade union-related reforms under the Employment Rights Act 2025. She discusses how these changes are modernising industrial relations and rebalancing the relationship between employers and unions, and looks in particular at:
- the new duty to inform workers of their right to join a union;
- unions’ right of access to the workplace; and
- the role of the Fair Work Agency.
Tune in to hear what employers need to know, and how these reforms could reshape the future of industrial relations.
Read the transcript
Robert Shore: Hello, and welcome to the Brightmine podcast, formerly known as the XpertHR podcast. Brightmine is a leading provider of people data, analytics and insight, offering employment law expertise, comprehensive HR resources and reward data to meet every HR and organisational challenge and opportunity. You can find us any time of the day or night at https://www.brightmine.com.
My name is Robert Shore, and today we’re going to be talking about one of the most significant shifts in UK employment law in recent years, that is the trade union reforms and the Employment Rights Act 2025 (or the ERA). Organisations are now very much living in the ERA era.
These reforms are part of a broader Government agenda to modernize industrial relations, strengthen worker voice and rebalance the relationship between employers and trade unions. But what does that actually mean in practice? To help unpack it all, I’m joined by Lilia Dangi, who has many years’ experience working with HR as well. Welcome to the podcast, Lilia.
Lilia Dangi: Hello Robert. Thanks for having me.
Robert Shore: Right. So let’s paint in the big picture to begin with. What is the Government trying to achieve with these reforms?
Lilia Dangi: So, looking at the big picture, these reforms are about resetting and modernising the UK’s industrial relations framework. The Government wants to strip away what it sees as unnecessary restrictions on trade unions, and give workers a stronger collective voice. It’s a clear push towards more collaboration, more balance between employers and unions, and essentially making it easier for unions to organise, recruit and represent workers.
Robert Shore: Yeah. So what we see there then is this isn’t just a sort of technical legal change. There really is an underlying philosophical shift.
Lilia Dangi: Absolutely. This truly marks a philosophical shift. We saw that as soon as the Employment Rights Act received Royal Assent last December. The Government moved to repeal the strike’s minimum service levels at 2023, not that the act had been particularly impactful, but it did set the tone by removing a restriction on strikes.
Then on 18 February this year, the Government rolled back many of the restrictions from the Trade Union Act 2016. Then again in April this year we saw the first major wave of changes under the new Employment Rights Act, which made union recognition easier and loosened the rules around industrial action, which then results in fewer hurdles before a strike, shorter notice periods and simpler ballots.
Robert Shore: Right. So in brief, more strikes?
Lilia Dangi: Well potentially, yes. And if more strikes do happen, the new rules give workers stronger protections when they take action.
Robert Shore: Right. So how should HR be thinking about this?
Lilia Dangi: So, HR should really focus on preparation and engagement. In practice, that means being ready for these changes and investing in solid relationship with employees because those relationships matter more now than they ever did before.
The theme of these reforms is clear in that the Government really wants stronger unions, easier recognition and a more active union presence in the workplace.
Robert Shore: So there Lilia, you mentioned various changes that have already come into force. There are lots more to come, of course. So let’s move onto one of the most talked-about upcoming changes, that’s the new duty to inform workers of their right to join a trade union. What do HR teams need to do there?
Lilia Dangi: Right. So this is one of the key reforms coming on 1 October this year, and under the new law employers must provide a written statement telling new joiners they have the right to join a trade union. The notice must be given alongside the usual statutory written statement of employment particulars, so effectively it becomes part of the paperwork for new starters.
Robert Shore: Yeah. So it becomes part of onboarding? Lilia Dangi: It essentially becomes an onboarding requirement. We are awaiting the final drafting of the regulations but it does look like this will be a separate document given to new joiners at the same time as their standard contract and particulars. In short, every new employee will be formally notified of their right to join a union when they start.
Robert Shore: And is there a requirement too in relation to existing staff?
Lilia Dangi: Yes. Employers will also need to give this notice to existing staff at specified regular intervals, although the exact timing will come in the regulations as well. So how employers do this will depend on how they normally communicate with the workforce. It could be through the intranet, it could be in a firm-wide email, in a social media post that colleagues would see, or it could by physical noticeboards or even all of the above, whatever ensures that everyone gets the message.
Robert Shore: Yeah. So what’s the wider effect going to be?
Lilia Dangi: Well, it’s going to make employees more aware of unions, which is obviously the intention, and combined with other reforms like union access rights, which I guess we’re going to discuss in a moment, it’s fair to assume, or even really expect, that it could lead to higher union engagement and possibly more people joining unions.
Robert Shore: Right. As you predicted there, let’s talk about union access rights now. This is a big shift, also slated to be introduced in October of this year.
Lilia Dangi: Absolutely. Trade unions are being given a statutory right to access workplaces to recruit members and also to organise. Now that doesn’t mean that they can come in to plan a strike on your premises but it does mean that they’ll have a legal standing to talk to workers and encourage membership.
Robert Shore: Okay. So what does that mean practically?
Lilia Dangi: In practical terms, if a union wants to speak to your workers it can now formally request access to your workplace. It can do so either in person or digitally. If the employer can’t agree on how or when that happens, the union can ask the Central Arbitration Committee (or the CAC) to step in and decide. Digital access might operate along, or even replace, an onsite visit. So for example, an employer could share union communication via email or they could host virtual Q&A sessions. Unions might also get to contact workers directly, again say by email, if employers give clear consent under data protection rules.
And then in terms of physical access, employers will be expected to take reasonable steps to let union representatives on site, while of course respecting health and safety requirements. And more importantly, an employer can’t just attend these union meetings unless they’ve been explicitly invited by the union. And also employers shouldn’t really be questioning workers afterwards about what was discussed in those meetings.
Robert Shore: Yes. Now ideally, union and employer should try to agree voluntary access arrangements before a formal request is made. But as you say, if agreement isn’t reached then the CAC, the Central Arbitration Committee, will decide. What are the criteria for its decisions?
Lilia Dangi: Well, the law sets out certain cases where the CAC must refuse a union’s access request, for example where an employer has fewer than 21 workers in total, and this is across the whole company, not just one site.
Also, if a union’s access agreement doesn’t give at least five working days’ notice for the first visit, or if the proposed access agreement would last longer than two years, those requests will be turned down. And I’m drawing on what’s been published around the consultation process for the details here. The Government made its response on 6 April but we are still waiting on the final regulations for the full details.
Robert Shore: Yeah. Are there any other circumstances when the CAC will refuse access?
Lilia Dangi: There are also a few situations where the CAC might use its discretion to refuse access. So for instance, where an employer already recognises an independent union or where a statutory recognition process is underway, then the CAC can say no if the union’s request overlaps with the existing access agreement or if there are multiple unions making competing requests at the same time.
Another factor is excessive burden. So if fulfilling a request would force the employer into something unreasonable, like for example building new facilities or buying special IT systems just for the union, then the CAC could decide to refuse those cases too.
Robert Shore: Okay. So how can we [unclear – 0:09:46.0] the overall implications of this?
Lilia Dangi: So the bottom line here is that all employers need to be prepared, even those who currently have no union involvement. The rules will apply across the board so everyone should really plan ahead.
Robert Shore: Yes, so this is a question I’ve seen asked. Obviously this is about union recognition. Do employers actually have to recognise a union?
Lilia Dangi: Not automatically, no. So you’re only required to formally recognise a union if it wins a statutory recognition ballot among your workers. I know that we’ve had some questions about whether having a staff council or employee forum could be an alternative to a union. The answer is no. A staff forum doesn’t replace a union. You can certainly, of course, have you know, those forums for employee voice, but they won’t exempt you from recognising a union that meets the legal requirements.
Robert Shore: Those are the big two things happening in October but there are a couple more union-related ERA changes coming this autumn, aren’t there?
Lilia Dangi: Well yes. There are a couple of other union-related changes in October this year. They are new rights and protections for union representatives, for example making it easier for them to do their jobs without detriment. And another big one is an extension of protection from detrimental treatment for workers who take part in industrial action. So basically, stronger safeguards so workers can’t be penalised for going on strike.
Robert Shore: Yes. And of course you can find more details about those changes, all of these changes, in fact, on the Brightmine website, where we have supporting materials.
Now, let’s bring in another key element of the ERA, the Employment Rights Act 2025, the Fair Work Agency. So what is the Fair Work Agency?
Lilia Dangi: Right. So the Fair Work Agency is essentially a new single enforcement body for employment rights that was launched on 7 April this year. It brings together several existing regulators into one organisation, and the aim is to have a more consistent and effective enforcement system for employment rights. So instead of something patchy or fragmented, which is basically what we’ve had in the past.
Robert Shore: So it simplifies enforcement?
Lilia Dangi: Yes. It simplifies enforcement and it also makes it tougher at the same time. So what’s happening here is that we are moving from a traditionally reactive system where enforcement mostly happens only if an individual files a claim, to a more proactive model led by the state. So in other words, the agency itself can step in to enforce the rules rather than waiting for employees to raise issues.
Robert Shore: Okay. And why does that matter in practice?
Lilia Dangi: So this matters because enforcement will be far more active and visible now. The Fair Work Agency has broad powers, which consist of investigating employers, inspecting workplaces, demanding paperwork and taking enforcement action if something’s not right. It can also bring employment tribunal claims on behalf of workers, which is a massive shift from how things used to work.
Robert Shore: So risk increases?
Lilia Dangi: Yes, absolutely. The risk of getting audited and penalised is higher now. The key point, though, is that your compliance needs to be solid. All your policies, processes and records should be ready to hold up under scrutiny because the chances of an inspection or an investigation are definitely going up.
Robert Shore: Okay. And I know there are different views on what difference the Fair Work Agency is likely to make. What do you think?
Lilia Dangi: It really depends on the resources the new agency gets, right? So if the Fair Work Agency is well funded and well staffed, it could have a big impact and it could really change the enforcement landscape. But if the budget or the staffing is limited, then the impacts might be more muffled. So there’s a bit of a ‘wait and see’ element to it all, in terms of how much difference it would actually make in practice.
Robert Shore: Okay. Does this link to the union reforms?
Lilia Dangi: You could say it’s all part of the same trend, really. So we’re talking here giving workers a stronger voice, making union activity easier and enforcing rights more effectively. All these reforms align with the broader shift in how the workplace is regulated.
Robert Shore: Yeah. So let’s now think about some practical steps, some takeaways for HR. There’s a lot here. Where should HR teams start?
Lilia Dangi: Yes, there’s a lot, and all this can be overwhelming and feel like a lot to manage. But the key is really to break it down in clear priorities, and I’d suggest focusing on five practical areas.
So firstly, get your documentation in order. This means adding the new rights to join a union notice in your onboarding materials, reviewing contracts and handbooks to see if they need updating, and planning how you will distribute that information to your existing staff as well as new joiners. This is one of the top priorities because it’s an immediate compliance obligation.
Secondly, prepare for union access requests. And this means deciding who in your team is going to handle these requests, setting up a standard process for how you respond, and also thinking through how access would work operationally. For example, where would you hold an onsite visit or how would you manage a virtual meeting? The idea is once these access rights go live, employers won’t have much time to figure it out, so having a plan ahead of time is really crucial.
Moving onto number three, take a step back and review overall employee relations strategy. With unions being more easily recognised and able to access workplaces, organisations want to make sure they have strong channels for employee voice internally. Also ensuring employees have ways to raise concerns or feedback directly and trying to spot any issues early. We should think of this as preventative, right? So if your workplace feels heard and engaged, then disputes are less likely to escalate or push employees towards seeking union intervention.
Robert Shore: I know we have five, so what’s the fourth point, Lilia?
Lilia Dangi: Right. So the fourth point is to check your readiness for industrial action. This includes updating business continuity plans – so how you keep things running if there’s a strike – and also training managers on the right way to respond to strikes or picketing.
Another thing is to review how your internal escalation processes would work if a strike seems likely. So with the legal barriers to industrial actions reducing, being well prepared here is really important. I can’t stress that enough.
And then finally organisations really need to do a thorough compliance audit, especially in light of the Fair Work Agency. So since enforcement will be more proactive, it’s important that organisations and HR double-check that they are compliant with all the key employment rights like pay, working times, holidays and so on. Make sure your records are up-to-date and accessible and that your policies are actually being followed in practice and not just written down and forgotten about.
And the key shift here is moving from reacting to complaints to being ready for inspections before they even happen.
Robert Shore: Yes. I like what you said there as well about policies being followed in practice, not just being in written form.
Right, so if you had to sum it all up, reduce it all down to just, I don’t know, ten words…you can have a few more than that but, you know!
Lilia Dangi: To sum it up, I’d say get your documentations right. That’s number one. Prepare your processes. And strengthen your employee relationship. The important thing to note here is that this isn’t just a tick-box legal change; it’s actually a genuine shift in how our workplaces operate. So HR needs to be proactively ready here.
Robert Shore: That’s a great note to end on. Right, the trade union reforms under the ERA, together with the introduction of the Fair Work Agency, mark a major shift in how employment relationships are managed and enforced in the UK, and of course on the Brightmine website we have lots of supporting materials to help you navigate your way through all of these compliance changes. I’ll put links to some of those in the show notes.
And so now I just need to say thank you to Lilia for joining us today. Thank you, Lilia.
Lilia Dangi: Thank you for having me.
Robert Shore: And thank you to everyone for listening. And until next time.
Brightmine host

Robert Shore
HR Markets Insights Editor, Brightmine
Guest speakers

Lilia Dangi
Legal Editor, Brightmine
You may also be interested in…
Sign up to receive expert HR insights from Brightmine
Join our community and stay updated with industry trends, expert insights, valuable resources, webinar invites… and much more.
Sign up now and receive regular updates straight to your inbox!



